Triple
T5032797
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Atlanta urban area |
E113345
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasMajorCity |
P316
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Lilburn |
E390857
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Lilburn | Statement: [Atlanta urban area, hasMajorCity, Lilburn]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Lilburn Context triple: [Atlanta urban area, hasMajorCity, Lilburn]
-
A.
Lilburn, Georgia
chosen
Lilburn, Georgia is a suburban city in the Atlanta metropolitan area known for its diverse community and family-oriented neighborhoods.
-
B.
Cedartown
Cedartown is a small city in northwestern Georgia known historically for its location within the mineral-rich Georgia Gold Belt and its role as a local industrial and railroad hub.
-
C.
Dawsonville
Dawsonville is a small city in north Georgia known for its gold rush history and strong ties to stock car racing and NASCAR culture.
-
D.
Loganville
Loganville is a suburban city in the Atlanta metropolitan area known for its residential communities and small-town character.
-
E.
Coolidge, Georgia
Coolidge, Georgia is a small rural city located in Thomas County in the southern part of the U.S. state of Georgia.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69bd443775e48190a646ffbfc4334723 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 12:57 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69bd73b4d1708190aa1fa63104555f8a |
completed | March 20, 2026, 4:20 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69bef7eae20c81908e5854f5d66a69b2 |
completed | March 21, 2026, 7:56 p.m. |
Created at: March 20, 2026, 1:36 p.m.