Triple
T5028200
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Chaffing and winnowing |
E113228
|
entity |
| Predicate | designMotivation |
P41372
|
FINISHED |
| Object | demonstrate that confidentiality need not imply encryption |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: demonstrate that confidentiality need not imply encryption | Statement: [Chaffing and winnowing, designMotivation, demonstrate that confidentiality need not imply encryption]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: designMotivation Context triple: [Chaffing and winnowing, designMotivation, demonstrate that confidentiality need not imply encryption]
-
A.
reasonForDesign
chosen
Indicates that one entity serves as the explanation, motivation, or justification for why another entity was designed or created in a particular way.
-
B.
motivationFor
Indicates that one entity serves as the reason, drive, or incentive behind another entity’s action, state, or occurrence.
-
C.
designPhilosophy
Indicates the guiding principles, values, or conceptual approach that shape how something is designed or created.
-
D.
designUse
Indicates that one entity is used as a design basis, purpose, or intended functional use for another entity.
-
E.
designIntent
Indicates the underlying purpose, rationale, or functional goal that guided the creation or configuration of something.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69bd443775e48190a646ffbfc4334723 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 12:57 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69bd738d852c8190a122354f1e1f5343 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 4:19 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69bd71509e9c8190a60c1d8d04936a12 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 4:09 p.m. |
Created at: March 20, 2026, 1:36 p.m.