Triple

T5015682
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject SBC E112735 entity
Predicate supportsSubbands P61515 FINISHED
Object 4 LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 4 | Statement: [SBC, supportsSubbands, 4]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: supportsSubbands
Context triple: [SBC, supportsSubbands, 4]
  • A. supportsSingleFrequencyNetworks
    Indicates that an entity enables or is compatible with operating in single frequency networks, where multiple transmitters use the same frequency to provide coordinated coverage.
  • B. supportsBandwidths
    Indicates that an entity is compatible with or can operate using the specified range or set of bandwidth values.
  • C. supportsChannels
    Indicates that one entity is capable of handling, providing, or being compatible with one or more specified channels for communication, distribution, or operation.
  • D. hasBandRange
    Indicates that one entity has an associated range or span of bands (such as frequency or wavelength intervals) defined by the other entity.
  • E. supportedIn
    Indicates that one entity is valid, applicable, or functionally enabled within the context, environment, platform, or scope defined by another entity.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69bd4434acb8819086679dbeccc2fe54 completed March 20, 2026, 12:57 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69bd732f4c5c8190b90f8e4daab458ee completed March 20, 2026, 4:17 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69bd714ecfe08190b5830cfc1c74fa17 completed March 20, 2026, 4:09 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69bd72e1b7cc8190b2e621fdf8f22e38 completed March 20, 2026, 4:16 p.m.
Created at: March 20, 2026, 1:35 p.m.