Triple

T5008403
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Sagredo E112552 entity
Predicate functionInDialogue P31331 FINISHED
Object tests strength of arguments LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: tests strength of arguments | Statement: [Sagredo, functionInDialogue, tests strength of arguments]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: functionInDialogue
Context triple: [Sagredo, functionInDialogue, tests strength of arguments]
  • A. dialogueWith
    Indicates that two entities are engaged in a mutual conversational exchange or dialogue with each other.
  • B. dialogueForm chosen
    Indicates that one entity takes the form or structure of a dialogue, typically involving conversational or interactive exchange between parties.
  • C. dialogueType
    Indicates the specific kind or category of dialogue occurring between entities (e.g., question-answer, negotiation, instruction).
  • D. functionInText
    Indicates that a text segment serves a specific rhetorical or structural function within a larger text.
  • E. functionInWork
    Indicates that a particular function, role, or operation is performed, utilized, or occurs within the context of a specific work or creation.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69bd4433d0b08190877e83959ef40d81 completed March 20, 2026, 12:57 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69bd730a7590819088ab8d49c5c88c2f completed March 20, 2026, 4:17 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69bd714cbc448190aa53a8a83d768b64 completed March 20, 2026, 4:09 p.m.
Created at: March 20, 2026, 1:35 p.m.