Triple
T4995876
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Treaty of Altranstädt (1706) |
E112243
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasOutcomeForSweden |
P33358
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Strengthening of Swedish diplomatic position |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Strengthening of Swedish diplomatic position | Statement: [Treaty of Altranstädt (1706), hasOutcomeForSweden, Strengthening of Swedish diplomatic position]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasOutcomeForSweden Context triple: [Treaty of Altranstädt (1706), hasOutcomeForSweden, Strengthening of Swedish diplomatic position]
-
A.
outcomeOf
Indicates that one entity is the result, consequence, or product that arises from another entity, event, or process.
-
B.
hasConclusion
Indicates that something leads to, results in, or is associated with a particular conclusion.
-
C.
supportedOutcomeOf
Indicates that one entity serves as evidence, backing, or justification for the outcome or result represented by another entity.
-
D.
hasEventOutcome
chosen
Indicates that a particular event results in, leads to, or is associated with a specific outcome.
-
E.
outcomeOfTrial
Indicates that a particular result or verdict is produced as the consequence of a specific trial or legal proceeding.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69bd4432b32c81909f3b3c6bd10f0653 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 12:57 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69bd7472a1dc8190942f568a81fdd961 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 4:23 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69bd714aee2481908fb0dd5fa2daf3a1 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 4:09 p.m. |
Created at: March 20, 2026, 1:34 p.m.