Triple
T4977458
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Honeycomb (Dalgona) challenge |
E111802
|
entity |
| Predicate | failureCondition |
P8788
|
FINISHED |
| Object | breaking the candy shape |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: breaking the candy shape | Statement: [Honeycomb (Dalgona) challenge, failureCondition, breaking the candy shape]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: failureCondition Context triple: [Honeycomb (Dalgona) challenge, failureCondition, breaking the candy shape]
-
A.
failedOn
Indicates that an attempted action or process did not succeed when applied to a specific target, condition, or step.
-
B.
missionFailure
Indicates that an attempted mission or operation did not achieve its intended objectives or outcome.
-
C.
terminationCondition
Indicates the condition or set of conditions under which an ongoing process, activity, or relationship is brought to an end.
-
D.
failsWhen
chosen
Indicates that a particular action, process, or condition does not succeed under the specified circumstances or triggers.
-
E.
fallCause
Indicates that one event or condition causes or brings about another event of falling or decline.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69bd441adc208190b70a033a0741d01e |
completed | March 20, 2026, 12:56 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69bd730a7590819088ab8d49c5c88c2f |
completed | March 20, 2026, 4:17 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69bd7146e6e881908a55ab2756b631f6 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 4:09 p.m. |
Created at: March 20, 2026, 1:33 p.m.