Triple
T4973399
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Quinault River (upper reaches) |
E111705
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasLandUseRestriction |
P41739
|
FINISHED |
| Object | wilderness protection regulations |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: wilderness protection regulations | Statement: [Quinault River (upper reaches), hasLandUseRestriction, wilderness protection regulations]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasLandUseRestriction Context triple: [Quinault River (upper reaches), hasLandUseRestriction, wilderness protection regulations]
-
A.
hasShorelineUseRestrictions
Indicates that there are specific rules or limitations governing how the shoreline area associated with an entity may be used or developed.
-
B.
hasLandUseCharacter
Indicates that one entity possesses or is associated with a particular type or pattern of land use.
-
C.
landUseIncludes
Indicates that a specified land area contains or permits the specified type(s) of land use within its boundaries.
-
D.
hasLandStatus
chosen
Indicates that an entity possesses a particular legal or administrative status regarding land (such as ownership, tenure, protection, or use designation).
-
E.
hasSemanticRestriction
Indicates that a concept or relation is constrained in meaning or usage by specific semantic conditions or limitations.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69bd441a0eb481908050fa4273b19eae |
completed | March 20, 2026, 12:56 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69bd730a7590819088ab8d49c5c88c2f |
completed | March 20, 2026, 4:17 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69bd7146e6e881908a55ab2756b631f6 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 4:09 p.m. |
Created at: March 20, 2026, 1:33 p.m.