Triple
T496338
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Court of Justice of the European Union |
E10301
|
entity |
| Predicate | appliesPrinciple |
P1757
|
FINISHED |
| Object | direct effect of EU law |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: direct effect of EU law | Statement: [Court of Justice of the European Union, appliesPrinciple, direct effect of EU law]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: appliesPrinciple Context triple: [Court of Justice of the European Union, appliesPrinciple, direct effect of EU law]
-
A.
usesPrinciple
chosen
Indicates that one entity applies, relies on, or is based upon a particular principle in its functioning, reasoning, or design.
-
B.
establishesPrinciple
Indicates that an entity formulates, defines, or sets forth a foundational rule, guideline, or standard that others are expected to follow or build upon.
-
C.
supportsPrinciple
Indicates that one entity endorses, upholds, or actively backs a particular principle or doctrine.
-
D.
appliesAt
Indicates that an action, rule, or condition is relevant to or in effect at a specific location, context, or point in time.
-
E.
appliesTo
Indicates that something is relevant, valid, or has effect in relation to a particular entity, case, or context.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a2e847df8481909239ec08ccf1e376 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:06 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a2f115334881908ac5ab96c7f4214e |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:43 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a2edfa87cc8190a77c726a5a55b7d9 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:30 p.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:12 p.m.