Triple
T4952884
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Manchu |
E111209
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasVariety |
P455
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Sibe language |
E302347
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Sibe language | Statement: [Manchu, hasVariety, Sibe language]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Sibe language Context triple: [Manchu, hasVariety, Sibe language]
-
A.
Sibe language
chosen
Sibe language is a modern Tungusic language spoken primarily by the Sibe people in Xinjiang, China, and is closely related to Manchu.
-
B.
Assiniboine language
The Assiniboine language is an Indigenous Siouan language traditionally spoken by the Assiniboine people of the Northern Plains in North America.
-
C.
Sakha language
The Sakha language is a Turkic language spoken primarily by the Sakha (Yakut) people in northeastern Siberia, where it serves as a major regional and cultural language.
-
D.
Tsakhur language
The Tsakhur language is a Northeast Caucasian language spoken primarily by the Tsakhur people in parts of Azerbaijan and Dagestan.
-
E.
Osage language
The Osage language is a Siouan language traditionally spoken by the Osage people of the central United States, now the focus of revitalization and preservation efforts.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69bd4418390c8190b7e9766a2512ce55 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 12:56 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69bd71b82dd88190adfb08c3b3191fe0 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 4:11 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69be81d773bc8190861be7ad83de6c2a |
completed | March 21, 2026, 11:32 a.m. |
Created at: March 20, 2026, 1:31 p.m.