Triple
T4949972
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Dargin |
E111143
|
entity |
| Predicate | closelyRelatedTo |
P37
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Lak language |
E416665
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Lak language | Statement: [Dargin, closelyRelatedTo, Lak language]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Lak language Context triple: [Dargin, closelyRelatedTo, Lak language]
-
A.
Lak language
chosen
The Lak language is a Northeast Caucasian language spoken primarily by the Lak people in the Republic of Dagestan in the North Caucasus region of Russia.
-
B.
Laka language
Laka language is a lesser-known Adamawa–Ubangi language spoken in parts of Central Africa, particularly in Chad and neighboring regions.
-
C.
Lakalai language
The Lakalai language is an Austronesian language spoken by the Lakalai people of New Britain in Papua New Guinea.
-
D.
Lakkia language
The Lakkia language is a lesser-known Tai–Kadai language spoken by the Lakkia ethnic group in parts of southern China, notable for its unique blend of Tai–Kadai and Hmong–Mien linguistic features.
-
E.
Nomlaki language
The Nomlaki language is an endangered Native American language traditionally spoken by the Nomlaki people of northern California.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69bd441721cc819085c7e33fe0876818 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 12:56 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69bd7167f97481908db5bfa9338e3824 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 4:10 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69be81d03b088190aa6601298ee4d8fd |
completed | March 21, 2026, 11:32 a.m. |
Created at: March 20, 2026, 1:31 p.m.