Triple
T4943408
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | LMC |
E110989
|
entity |
| Predicate | possibleFirstInfall |
P60187
|
FINISHED |
| Object | true |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [LMC, possibleFirstInfall, true]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: possibleFirstInfall Context triple: [LMC, possibleFirstInfall, true]
-
A.
possibleRelative
Indicates a relationship where one entity may be related to another by family or kinship, but the exact nature of the relationship is uncertain or not fully established.
-
B.
possibleIssue
Indicates that there is a potential or suspected problem, defect, or undesired condition associated with the referenced entity or situation, though it is not yet confirmed.
-
C.
possibleJudgment
Indicates a potential or anticipated judgment, decision, or evaluative outcome that could be made about an entity or situation.
-
D.
fallsIn
Indicates that one entity is located within, contained by, or geographically/administratively included inside another entity.
-
E.
hasPotential
Indicates that an entity possesses the capacity or possibility to develop, achieve, or exhibit a particular state, quality, or outcome in the future.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69bd441721cc819085c7e33fe0876818 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 12:56 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69bd70a7650c8190b046b65072fd8eae |
completed | March 20, 2026, 4:07 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69bd6c389b9881908ad7fb1c5393c1b1 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 3:48 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69bd6ff85b50819081d78087caa6b473 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 4:04 p.m. |
Created at: March 20, 2026, 1:31 p.m.