Triple

T493467
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Altaic languages (proposed) E10238 entity
Predicate typologicalFeatures P5201 FINISHED
Object agglutinative morphology LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: agglutinative morphology | Statement: [Altaic languages (proposed), typologicalFeatures, agglutinative morphology]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: typologicalFeatures
Context triple: [Altaic languages (proposed), typologicalFeatures, agglutinative morphology]
  • A. linguisticFeature
    Indicates a relationship where a linguistic property, pattern, or characteristic is attributed to or associated with a language-related entity (such as a word, phrase, or text).
  • B. hasLinguisticTypology chosen
    Indicates a relationship where a language or linguistic system is characterized by a specific typological classification or structural type.
  • C. linguisticType
    Indicates the type or category of language or linguistic system associated with an entity (e.g., spoken, signed, written, or other linguistic modality).
  • D. typicalFeatures
    Indicates that the related entities are characteristic or commonly occurring features or attributes of something.
  • E. typology
    Indicates a classification relationship in which entities are grouped or organized according to shared types, patterns, or structural characteristics.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a2e847df8481909239ec08ccf1e376 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:06 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a2f0fbfa408190aeb3b93996a35c00 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:43 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a2edf90ca88190b6a182e5b6733612 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:30 p.m.
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:12 p.m.