Triple
T4915261
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | County of Lippe |
E110331
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasCapital |
P204
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Detmold |
E269423
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Detmold | Statement: [County of Lippe, hasCapital, Detmold]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Detmold Context triple: [County of Lippe, hasCapital, Detmold]
-
A.
Detmold
chosen
Detmold is a historic town in northwestern Germany that served as the capital and residence city of the former Principality of Lippe.
-
B.
Lippstadt
Lippstadt is a historic town in North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany, known for its medieval architecture and role in regional conflicts.
-
C.
Meppen
Meppen is a historic town in Lower Saxony, Germany, known as a regional center in the Emsland district near the Dutch border.
-
D.
Bielefeld
Bielefeld is a major city in northwestern Germany known for its industrial heritage, university, and the tongue-in-cheek “Bielefeld conspiracy” meme claiming it does not exist.
-
E.
Iserlohn
Iserlohn is a city in the Märkischer Kreis district of North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany, known historically for its role in World War II and its metalworking and industrial heritage.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69bd44132b94819088522d92beaadc78 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 12:56 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69bd6fa404f881908b4f983983ac7076 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 4:02 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69c74872582c81908c64a9bf925f67c6 |
completed | March 28, 2026, 3:18 a.m. |
Created at: March 20, 2026, 1:29 p.m.