Triple
T489664
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Saar Offensive |
E9956
|
entity |
| Predicate | strategicAssessment |
P675
|
FINISHED |
| Object | failed to significantly aid Poland |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: failed to significantly aid Poland | Statement: [Saar Offensive, strategicAssessment, failed to significantly aid Poland]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: strategicAssessment Context triple: [Saar Offensive, strategicAssessment, failed to significantly aid Poland]
-
A.
strategicGoal
Indicates that one entity represents a long-term objective or desired outcome that another entity is intentionally aiming to achieve or align actions toward.
-
B.
strategicLocation
Indicates that an entity is positioned in a place of particular tactical or strategic importance relative to goals, resources, or other entities.
-
C.
historicalAssessment
chosen
Indicates an evaluation or judgment of something based on its historical context, significance, or development over time.
-
D.
militaryStrategy
Indicates a relationship where an entity plans, directs, or is associated with the organized use of armed forces and tactics to achieve military or defense objectives.
-
E.
assessedBy
Indicates that an entity has been evaluated, examined, or judged by another entity (typically an agent or authority).
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a2e802e2908190ab17c9479e0b6412 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:05 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a2f0e0a9648190b6a3b2da3a3b51e6 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:42 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a2edf63fbc819090ea6ca11f39116a |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:30 p.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:12 p.m.