Triple
T4863004
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Davis v. Monroe County Board of Education |
E108703
|
entity |
| Predicate | jurisprudentialImpact |
P39579
|
FINISHED |
| Object | clarified scope of institutional liability for peer harassment under Title IX |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: clarified scope of institutional liability for peer harassment under Title IX | Statement: [Davis v. Monroe County Board of Education, jurisprudentialImpact, clarified scope of institutional liability for peer harassment under Title IX]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: jurisprudentialImpact Context triple: [Davis v. Monroe County Board of Education, jurisprudentialImpact, clarified scope of institutional liability for peer harassment under Title IX]
-
A.
jurisprudenceDiscussedIn
Indicates that a topic, issue, or principle of jurisprudence is examined, analyzed, or debated within a particular document, discussion, or source.
-
B.
impactOnLaw
chosen
Indicates the effect or influence that one entity, event, or action has on laws, legal rules, or the legal system.
-
C.
legalDoctrineInfluenced
Indicates that one legal doctrine has shaped, informed, or contributed to the development or interpretation of another legal doctrine.
-
D.
courtInfluence
Indicates that one party exerts or holds influence over decisions, outcomes, or behavior within a court or judicial setting.
-
E.
legalPhilosophy
Indicates the philosophical principles, theories, or viewpoints that underpin or guide a legal system, doctrine, or interpretation.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69bd440b965081908b0557721cae6338 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 12:56 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69bd6d60e47c819094b5fbe883db4c15 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 3:53 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69bd6c27334481909ba8ac80854f7d8e |
completed | March 20, 2026, 3:47 p.m. |
Created at: March 20, 2026, 1:26 p.m.