Triple
T4862953
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Gebser v. Lago Vista Independent School District |
E108702
|
entity |
| Predicate | rejectedTheory |
P29499
|
FINISHED |
| Object | respondeat superior liability under Title IX |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: respondeat superior liability under Title IX | Statement: [Gebser v. Lago Vista Independent School District, rejectedTheory, respondeat superior liability under Title IX]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: rejectedTheory Context triple: [Gebser v. Lago Vista Independent School District, rejectedTheory, respondeat superior liability under Title IX]
-
A.
rejectedPractice
Indicates that one party has refused to accept, endorse, or continue a particular practice, method, or behavior associated with another party.
-
B.
rejectedIn
Indicates that an entity or proposal was not accepted or was turned down within a specific context, process, or location.
-
C.
rejectedBy
Indicates that one entity has been refused, dismissed, or not accepted by another entity.
-
D.
contradictedTheory
chosen
Indicates that one entity has presented evidence, arguments, or findings that oppose, challenge, or invalidate the theory proposed by another entity.
-
E.
rejectedJustification
Indicates that a proposed justification or reason offered in a context (e.g., argument, decision, or claim) has been evaluated and not accepted as valid or sufficient.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69bd440b965081908b0557721cae6338 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 12:56 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69bd6d60e47c819094b5fbe883db4c15 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 3:53 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69bd6c27334481909ba8ac80854f7d8e |
completed | March 20, 2026, 3:47 p.m. |
Created at: March 20, 2026, 1:26 p.m.