Triple
T48613
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Helvering v. Davis |
E954
|
entity |
| Predicate | generalWelfareInterpretation |
P2240
|
FINISHED |
| Object | general welfare is a broad national concept not limited to enumerated powers |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: general welfare is a broad national concept not limited to enumerated powers | Statement: [Helvering v. Davis, generalWelfareInterpretation, general welfare is a broad national concept not limited to enumerated powers]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: generalWelfareInterpretation Context triple: [Helvering v. Davis, generalWelfareInterpretation, general welfare is a broad national concept not limited to enumerated powers]
-
A.
statuteInterpreted
Indicates that a legal authority (such as a court or agency) has provided an interpretation or authoritative reading of a particular statute.
-
B.
constitutionalProvisionInterpreted
chosen
Indicates that a specific constitutional provision has been interpreted or given meaning by a judicial or authoritative body in relation to a particular context or case.
-
C.
interpretedInCase
Indicates that something is understood, analyzed, or given meaning within the context of a particular case or specific situational scenario.
-
D.
legalBasis
Indicates the legal rule, authority, or justification under which an action, decision, or status is established or carried out.
-
E.
benefits
Indicates that one entity gains an advantage, improvement, or positive outcome as a result of another entity or action.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a2480baefc81909951b14058479aa2 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:42 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a24c1a5c14819088748317a3f262c8 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:59 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a24abe7cb481908d969e54032f6c75 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:54 a.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:47 a.m.