Triple

T484891
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Supreme Court of the Virgin Islands E9852 entity
Predicate judicialReview P1004 FINISHED
Object can review constitutionality of territorial laws LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: can review constitutionality of territorial laws | Statement: [Supreme Court of the Virgin Islands, judicialReview, can review constitutionality of territorial laws]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: judicialReview
Context triple: [Supreme Court of the Virgin Islands, judicialReview, can review constitutionality of territorial laws]
  • A. judicialReviewBy chosen
    Indicates that a judicial body examines and evaluates the legality or constitutionality of an action, decision, or rule made by another authority.
  • B. judicialBody
    Indicates that an entity serves as a court or tribunal with authority to adjudicate legal disputes or interpret and apply the law.
  • C. hasJudiciary
    Indicates that an entity possesses, is served by, or is under the authority of a judicial body or legal court system.
  • D. judicialRole
    Indicates that one entity holds or performs a specific official function or position within the judicial system in relation to another entity or legal matter.
  • E. constitutionalChallenge
    Indicates a legal action or argument asserting that a law, policy, or governmental act violates a constitution and should be reviewed or invalidated.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a2e802e2908190ab17c9479e0b6412 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:05 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a2f0bb46788190b40182bf2a54f98f completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:42 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a2edf48ec08190b85d07e194f99c49 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:30 p.m.
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:12 p.m.