Triple
T4814528
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Edict of Thessalonica |
E107154
|
entity |
| Predicate | legalCollection |
P59792
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Codex Theodosianus 16.1.2 |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Codex Theodosianus 16.1.2 | Statement: [Edict of Thessalonica, legalCollection, Codex Theodosianus 16.1.2]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: legalCollection Context triple: [Edict of Thessalonica, legalCollection, Codex Theodosianus 16.1.2]
-
A.
legalCharge
Indicates that an authority has formally accused an entity of committing a specific legal offense or violation.
-
B.
legalCase
Indicates a relationship where a formal legal dispute or proceeding exists between parties, typically adjudicated by a court or similar authority.
-
C.
legalRepresentation
Indicates that one entity formally acts on behalf of another in legal matters, such as providing counsel, advocacy, or defense within a legal system.
-
D.
legalHolding
Indicates that an entity possesses or controls something (such as property, assets, or rights) in a manner recognized and defined by law.
-
E.
legalCaseAlongside
Indicates that two or more legal cases are proceeding in parallel or in coordination, such that they are related or handled together in some aspect of the legal process.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69bd43f779448190b92885cb70abb6c2 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 12:56 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69bd6ddd17d881909f7731ff2b460e83 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 3:55 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69bd6c1dfa3481909d240d50ed0ee38c |
completed | March 20, 2026, 3:47 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69bd6dda5e808190a26ec85e4499d8e4 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 3:55 p.m. |
Created at: March 20, 2026, 1:23 p.m.