Triple

T48086
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Calvinism E944 entity
Predicate affirms P3106 FINISHED
Object the doctrines of the Protestant Reformation LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: the doctrines of the Protestant Reformation | Statement: [Calvinism, affirms, the doctrines of the Protestant Reformation]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: affirms
Context triple: [Calvinism, affirms, the doctrines of the Protestant Reformation]
  • A. approves
    Indicates that one entity formally accepts, authorizes, or agrees to a proposal, action, or decision made by another entity.
  • B. assumes
    Indicates that one entity takes on, accepts, or presumes a role, responsibility, state, or fact regarding another entity or situation.
  • C. allows
    Indicates that one entity grants permission, capability, or opportunity for another entity to perform an action or be in a certain state.
  • D. approvedBy
    Indicates that an action, request, or item has received formal authorization or consent from a specified entity.
  • E. ensures
    Indicates that one entity guarantees or makes certain that a particular condition, outcome, or state holds for another entity or situation.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a2480baefc81909951b14058479aa2 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:42 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a24c1a5c14819088748317a3f262c8 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:59 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a24abe7cb481908d969e54032f6c75 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:54 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69a24c198e74819088a211001d0b54d4 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:59 a.m.
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:47 a.m.