Triple
T4799522
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Batista dictatorship |
E106797
|
entity |
| Predicate | legitimacyStrategy |
P13064
|
FINISHED |
| Object | controlled elections |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: controlled elections | Statement: [Batista dictatorship, legitimacyStrategy, controlled elections]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: legitimacyStrategy Context triple: [Batista dictatorship, legitimacyStrategy, controlled elections]
-
A.
legitimizedBy
Indicates that something gains legal, formal, or social validity as a result of the authority, action, or endorsement of another entity.
-
B.
helpedLegitimize
Indicates that one entity’s actions or support contributed to making another entity appear more credible, acceptable, or officially recognized.
-
C.
authorityLegitimacyBasis
Indicates the foundational source or justification that makes an authority’s power or right to rule recognized as valid or legitimate.
-
D.
usesStrategy
chosen
Indicates that an entity intentionally applies a particular strategy or method to achieve a goal or perform an action.
-
E.
doctrineName
Indicates that one entity is the formal or recognized name of a particular doctrine associated with another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69bd43f6a1e08190bf0a372bfc336ee5 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 12:56 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69bd6b40c29c8190adab3503f8ba0145 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 3:44 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69bd622f88188190a51d52ccfad3d2dd |
completed | March 20, 2026, 3:05 p.m. |
Created at: March 20, 2026, 1:23 p.m.