Triple

T4795596
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Three Dialogues between Hylas and Philonous E106703 entity
Predicate characterRoleOfHylas P23263 FINISHED
Object skeptic LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: skeptic | Statement: [Three Dialogues between Hylas and Philonous, characterRoleOfHylas, skeptic]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: characterRoleOfHylas
Context triple: [Three Dialogues between Hylas and Philonous, characterRoleOfHylas, skeptic]
  • A. featuresCharacterRole chosen
    Indicates that a work includes a character appearing in a specific narrative or functional role.
  • B. mythologicalRole
    Indicates the specific function, duty, or status an entity holds within a mythological or legendary context.
  • C. roleInTheology
    Indicates the specific function, position, or significance an entity holds within a theological system, doctrine, or belief framework.
  • D. characterPortrayedIs
    Indicates that one entity serves as the fictional or dramatic role that is depicted or played by another entity.
  • E. supportingCharacter
    Indicates that one entity plays a secondary or assisting role in the story or context relative to another primary entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69bd43f591c881909e5a532388b0f3f3 completed March 20, 2026, 12:56 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69bd6b40c29c8190adab3503f8ba0145 completed March 20, 2026, 3:44 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69bd622f88188190a51d52ccfad3d2dd completed March 20, 2026, 3:05 p.m.
Created at: March 20, 2026, 1:22 p.m.