Triple
T478925
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Nazca Lines |
E9122
|
entity |
| Predicate | climateCondition |
P193
|
FINISHED |
| Object | extremely arid |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: extremely arid | Statement: [Nazca Lines, climateCondition, extremely arid]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: climateCondition Context triple: [Nazca Lines, climateCondition, extremely arid]
-
A.
weatherCondition
Indicates the type of atmospheric state or weather pattern (e.g., sunny, rainy, snowy) affecting a location or time period.
-
B.
hasWeather
Indicates that a location or environment is experiencing or characterized by a particular type of weather condition.
-
C.
environmentalCondition
Indicates the state or characteristics of the surrounding physical environment that affect or describe a situation, process, or entity.
-
D.
hasClimate
chosen
Indicates that an entity possesses or is characterized by a particular type of climate or climatic conditions.
-
E.
averageTemperature
Indicates the typical or mean temperature value associated with an entity over a specified period or context.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a2e7ff81708190b0507a24a997232c |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:05 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a2f056459881909749764cc4a7f9e8 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:40 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a2edf1d5848190a7da27e2fddc136f |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:30 p.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:12 p.m.