Triple
T478412
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | S-matrix |
E9111
|
entity |
| Predicate | computedUsing |
P4746
|
FINISHED |
| Object | time-ordered exponentials |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: time-ordered exponentials | Statement: [S-matrix, computedUsing, time-ordered exponentials]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: computedUsing Context triple: [S-matrix, computedUsing, time-ordered exponentials]
-
A.
usesComputationMethod
Indicates that an entity performs its processing or decision-making by applying a specified computational method or algorithm.
-
B.
computes
Indicates that one entity performs a calculation or processing operation to produce a result from given data or inputs.
-
C.
actualUse
Indicates that an entity is currently being used or utilized in practice, as opposed to being merely available, planned, or potential.
-
D.
mathematicallyUses
chosen
Indicates that one entity employs or applies another entity within a mathematical context, such as in a formula, proof, computation, or theoretical framework.
-
E.
usedWith
Indicates that one entity is typically or appropriately employed together with another entity in a combined or complementary use.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a2e7ff81708190b0507a24a997232c |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:05 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a2f056459881909749764cc4a7f9e8 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:40 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a2edf017548190ae38ff3314a1ffa3 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:30 p.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:12 p.m.