Triple
T478203
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Nokia |
E9106
|
entity |
| Predicate | completedAcquisitionOf |
P2511
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Alcatel-Lucent in 2016 |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Alcatel-Lucent in 2016 | Statement: [Nokia, completedAcquisitionOf, Alcatel-Lucent in 2016]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: completedAcquisitionOf Context triple: [Nokia, completedAcquisitionOf, Alcatel-Lucent in 2016]
-
A.
completedIn
Indicates that an action, process, or task was fully finished within a specified time period or duration.
-
B.
acquisition
chosen
Indicates the act or relationship in which one entity obtains ownership or control of another entity, asset, or resource.
-
C.
completedBefore
Indicates that one event or action was fully completed prior to the start or completion of another specified event or action.
-
D.
completedWithDiscoveryOf
Indicates that an action, process, or event was brought to completion as a direct result of a particular discovery.
-
E.
acquisitionType
Indicates the specific kind or category of acquisition relationship that exists between entities (such as a company buying another company, assets, or a controlling stake).
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a2e7ff81708190b0507a24a997232c |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:05 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a2f03f3fbc81909af6e4496d5e6c2a |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:40 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a2edf017548190ae38ff3314a1ffa3 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:30 p.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:12 p.m.