Triple

T4769757
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Virginia Racial Integrity Act of 1924 E105895 entity
Predicate relatedCase P3137 FINISHED
Object Naim v. Naim
Naim v. Naim was a 1955 Virginia Supreme Court case that upheld the state’s ban on interracial marriage and foreshadowed the constitutional issues later resolved in Loving v. Virginia.
E465921 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (4 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Naim v. Naim | Statement: [Virginia Racial Integrity Act of 1924, relatedCase, Naim v. Naim]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Naim v. Naim
Context triple: [Virginia Racial Integrity Act of 1924, relatedCase, Naim v. Naim]
  • A. Lau v. Nichols
    Lau v. Nichols is a landmark 1974 U.S. Supreme Court case that held public schools must take affirmative steps to help non-English-speaking students overcome language barriers to ensure equal educational opportunity under federal civil rights law.
  • B. Lucas v. Earl
    Lucas v. Earl is a landmark 1930 U.S. Supreme Court tax law case that established the principle that income is taxed to the person who earns it, regardless of contractual arrangements to split or assign that income.
  • C. Argersinger v. Hamlin
    Argersinger v. Hamlin is a 1972 U.S. Supreme Court case that extended the right to counsel to defendants in misdemeanor cases that may result in imprisonment.
  • D. Hanna v. Plumer
    Hanna v. Plumer is a 1965 U.S. Supreme Court case that clarified the application of the Erie doctrine by holding that valid Federal Rules of Civil Procedure govern over conflicting state procedural laws in federal diversity actions.
  • E. Ray v. Blair
    Ray v. Blair is a 1952 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld a state's authority to require presidential electors to pledge support for their party's nominees as a condition of appointment.
  • F. None of above. chosen
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NEDg Description generation gpt-5.1
Instruction
Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. 
You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. 
# Instructions
Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. 
Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential.
# Response Format
Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"
Input
Entity: Naim v. Naim
Triple: [Virginia Racial Integrity Act of 1924, relatedCase, Naim v. Naim]
Generated description
Naim v. Naim was a 1955 Virginia Supreme Court case that upheld the state’s ban on interracial marriage and foreshadowed the constitutional issues later resolved in Loving v. Virginia.
NED2 Entity disambiguation (via description) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Naim v. Naim
Target entity description: Naim v. Naim was a 1955 Virginia Supreme Court case that upheld the state’s ban on interracial marriage and foreshadowed the constitutional issues later resolved in Loving v. Virginia.
  • A. Lau v. Nichols
    Lau v. Nichols is a landmark 1974 U.S. Supreme Court case that held public schools must take affirmative steps to help non-English-speaking students overcome language barriers to ensure equal educational opportunity under federal civil rights law.
  • B. Lucas v. Earl
    Lucas v. Earl is a landmark 1930 U.S. Supreme Court tax law case that established the principle that income is taxed to the person who earns it, regardless of contractual arrangements to split or assign that income.
  • C. Argersinger v. Hamlin
    Argersinger v. Hamlin is a 1972 U.S. Supreme Court case that extended the right to counsel to defendants in misdemeanor cases that may result in imprisonment.
  • D. Hanna v. Plumer
    Hanna v. Plumer is a 1965 U.S. Supreme Court case that clarified the application of the Erie doctrine by holding that valid Federal Rules of Civil Procedure govern over conflicting state procedural laws in federal diversity actions.
  • E. Ray v. Blair
    Ray v. Blair is a 1952 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld a state's authority to require presidential electors to pledge support for their party's nominees as a condition of appointment.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (5 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69bd43f226fc8190b867cc249c2a9042 completed March 20, 2026, 12:56 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69bd655aceb081908100ffc0498fe183 completed March 20, 2026, 3:18 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69be3a94e340819080fe92a2024abdaf completed March 21, 2026, 6:28 a.m.
NEDg Description generation batch_69be3b7d0e3c8190a4c4fabee0299908 completed March 21, 2026, 6:32 a.m.
NED2 Entity disambiguation (via description) batch_69be3c059b1c819084fa4c30e576fd2e completed March 21, 2026, 6:34 a.m.
Created at: March 20, 2026, 1:21 p.m.