Triple

T4766766
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject George Jacobs E105832 entity
Predicate conflictWith P4897 FINISHED
Object Thomas Putnam E8143 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Thomas Putnam | Statement: [George Jacobs, conflictWith, Thomas Putnam]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Thomas Putnam
Context triple: [George Jacobs, conflictWith, Thomas Putnam]
  • A. Thomas Putnam chosen
    Thomas Putnam was a prominent and influential accuser during the Salem witch trials, known for aggressively pursuing witchcraft charges against many of his neighbors.
  • B. Nathaniel Hathorne Sr.
    Nathaniel Hathorne Sr. was a New England sea captain and the father of American novelist Nathaniel Hawthorne.
  • C. Ann Putnam Sr.
    Ann Putnam Sr. was a prominent and influential accuser during the Salem witch trials of 1692 in colonial Massachusetts.
  • D. Samuel Parris
    Samuel Parris was the Puritan minister of Salem Village whose accusations and sermons helped ignite and intensify the Salem witch trials of 1692.
  • E. Giles Corey
    Giles Corey was an elderly farmer in colonial Massachusetts who became infamous for being pressed to death after refusing to enter a plea during the Salem witch trials.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69bd43f226fc8190b867cc249c2a9042 completed March 20, 2026, 12:56 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69bd65367a648190aaf0e34061ec7b43 completed March 20, 2026, 3:18 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69be3a8bd5248190bd6cc79170919148 completed March 21, 2026, 6:28 a.m.
Created at: March 20, 2026, 1:21 p.m.