Triple

T4761349
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Aboriginal peoples under the Constitution Act, 1982 E105704 entity
Predicate rightsRecognizedIn P58382 FINISHED
Object section 35(1) of the Constitution Act, 1982 LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: section 35(1) of the Constitution Act, 1982 | Statement: [Aboriginal peoples under the Constitution Act, 1982, rightsRecognizedIn, section 35(1) of the Constitution Act, 1982]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: rightsRecognizedIn
Context triple: [Aboriginal peoples under the Constitution Act, 1982, rightsRecognizedIn, section 35(1) of the Constitution Act, 1982]
  • A. rightsHolderRecognition
    Indicates that an entity formally acknowledges or identifies another entity as the legitimate holder of specific rights.
  • B. rightsInclude
    Indicates that one set of rights encompasses, contains, or subsumes another set of rights.
  • C. rights
    Indicates that an entity possesses entitlements, permissions, or legal/moral claims in relation to another entity or context.
  • D. rightsStatementType
    Indicates the specific category or nature of a rights statement that applies to a resource or entity.
  • E. recognizedRight
    Indicates that an agent formally acknowledges and accepts that another party possesses a specific right or entitlement.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69bd43f14cac819081c7c69803648211 completed March 20, 2026, 12:56 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69bd650eefe08190b99f9f01b121dbfd completed March 20, 2026, 3:17 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69bd6225c9488190afee5bb3619d0365 completed March 20, 2026, 3:05 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69bd631328fc81909b28ae0a2a3ed9bb completed March 20, 2026, 3:09 p.m.
Created at: March 20, 2026, 1:20 p.m.