Triple

T4759916
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Iota E105674 entity
Predicate historicallyRepresented P58355 FINISHED
Object short i sound LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: short i sound | Statement: [Iota, historicallyRepresented, short i sound]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: historicallyRepresented
Context triple: [Iota, historicallyRepresented, short i sound]
  • A. historicalRepresentative
    Indicates that one entity serves or served as an official representative or delegate of another entity in a historical context.
  • B. historicallyConsidered
    Indicates that one entity has been regarded or classified in a particular way relative to another entity during a past historical period.
  • C. historicallyDocumentedBy
    Indicates that information about an entity or event is recorded or attested in a specific historical document or source.
  • D. historicallyIn
    Indicates that one entity existed, occurred, or was situated within the historical context, period, or jurisdiction associated with another entity.
  • E. historicallyGivenIn
    Indicates that something was customarily or traditionally granted, presented, or assigned to something or someone in the past.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69bd43f14cac819081c7c69803648211 completed March 20, 2026, 12:56 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69bd650dc7fc81909b483ef3c456ae0d completed March 20, 2026, 3:17 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69bd6225c9488190afee5bb3619d0365 completed March 20, 2026, 3:05 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69bd631328fc81909b28ae0a2a3ed9bb completed March 20, 2026, 3:09 p.m.
Created at: March 20, 2026, 1:20 p.m.