Triple

T4759770
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Crown of Thorns E105671 entity
Predicate hasRelicTradition P46023 FINISHED
Object Crown of Thorns relic in Paris LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Crown of Thorns relic in Paris | Statement: [Crown of Thorns, hasRelicTradition, Crown of Thorns relic in Paris]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasRelicTradition
Context triple: [Crown of Thorns, hasRelicTradition, Crown of Thorns relic in Paris]
  • A. containsRelic
    Indicates that one entity holds, includes, or has within it a relic.
  • B. hasStatusInTradition
    Indicates that an entity holds a particular recognized status or standing within a specified tradition or traditional framework.
  • C. hasTraditionIn
    Indicates that a particular tradition, custom, or longstanding practice is present, observed, or established within a specified place, group, or context.
  • D. variantTraditions chosen
    Indicates that there exist differing or alternative traditions or customary practices associated with the same subject or context.
  • E. isRelictLineage
    Indicates that an entity represents a surviving remnant of an otherwise extinct evolutionary lineage.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69bd43f14cac819081c7c69803648211 completed March 20, 2026, 12:56 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69bd650dc7fc81909b483ef3c456ae0d completed March 20, 2026, 3:17 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69bd6225c9488190afee5bb3619d0365 completed March 20, 2026, 3:05 p.m.
Created at: March 20, 2026, 1:20 p.m.