Triple
T4759532
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Mandaeism |
E105666
|
entity |
| Predicate | viewsAbrahamAs |
P24623
|
FINISHED |
| Object | figure who corrupted monotheism |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: figure who corrupted monotheism | Statement: [Mandaeism, viewsAbrahamAs, figure who corrupted monotheism]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: viewsAbrahamAs Context triple: [Mandaeism, viewsAbrahamAs, figure who corrupted monotheism]
-
A.
describesAbrahamAs
chosen
Indicates that one entity characterizes or portrays Abraham in a particular way or with specific attributes.
-
B.
viewOfGod
Indicates a relationship where an entity holds a particular conception, perspective, or understanding of God.
-
C.
viewsPharaohAs
Indicates that one entity regards, interprets, or considers another entity specifically in the role or identity of a pharaoh.
-
D.
viewOnGod
Indicates a relationship where one entity holds or expresses a particular opinion, belief, or perspective about God.
-
E.
viewsAsOriginalIsraeliteReligion
Indicates that one entity regards another entity as representing or embodying the original or authentic form of the Israelite religion.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69bd43f14cac819081c7c69803648211 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 12:56 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69bd650dc7fc81909b483ef3c456ae0d |
completed | March 20, 2026, 3:17 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69bd6225c9488190afee5bb3619d0365 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 3:05 p.m. |
Created at: March 20, 2026, 1:20 p.m.