Triple

T4720028
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Aklanon E104740 entity
Predicate hasAlignmentType P59151 FINISHED
Object Austronesian alignment LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Austronesian alignment | Statement: [Aklanon, hasAlignmentType, Austronesian alignment]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasAlignmentType
Context triple: [Aklanon, hasAlignmentType, Austronesian alignment]
  • A. hasAlignment
    Indicates that one entity shares or exhibits a particular orientation, stance, or compatibility in relation to another entity or standard.
  • B. requiresAlignment
    Indicates that one entity depends on another entity being properly aligned or brought into a specified alignment condition before the relationship or action can occur.
  • C. hasRouteAlignment
    Indicates that there is a defined spatial or geometric alignment associated with a route or pathway.
  • D. basedOnAlignmentOf
    Indicates a relationship where one entity is determined, derived, or decided according to how closely it aligns with another entity’s position, orientation, or criteria.
  • E. alignsWith
    Indicates that one entity is in agreement, harmony, or consistent correspondence with another in terms of position, direction, standard, or principle.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69bd43ec4a348190bc41afae43375e71 completed March 20, 2026, 12:56 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69bd680beb508190b3d74e20e1c64405 completed March 20, 2026, 3:30 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69bd621ddcd88190903288566f5e5dab completed March 20, 2026, 3:05 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69bd680b06e881908de87edf815f3cc0 completed March 20, 2026, 3:30 p.m.
Created at: March 20, 2026, 1:18 p.m.