Triple

T471975
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject HTTP/1.1 E8577 entity
Predicate introducesHeader P3703 FINISHED
Object Host LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Host | Statement: [HTTP/1.1, introducesHeader, Host]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: introducesHeader
Context triple: [HTTP/1.1, introducesHeader, Host]
  • A. introduced
    Indicates that one entity caused another entity to become known, presented, or brought into use for the first time to a person, group, or context.
  • B. canIntroduce
    Indicates that one entity has the ability or permission to introduce another entity to a third party or context.
  • C. introducedRight
    Indicates that one entity formally presented or brought another entity to the attention of a third party or context, with the second entity occupying a role or position on the right side in that introduction.
  • D. headerField chosen
    Indicates that one entity is a specific header field (such as a name–value pair) belonging to or defined within another entity, typically a message, request, or document header.
  • E. introducedConcept
    Indicates that one entity is responsible for presenting, defining, or bringing a new concept into use or awareness for another entity or context.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a2e7f3aeb48190a19453e3a043f486 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:04 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a2eff24108819092fdb85019ec4089 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:38 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a2edecefb081908331ef8b9edf6636 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:30 p.m.
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:12 p.m.