Triple
T46851
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | UK government |
E917
|
entity |
| Predicate | retainedPowers |
P544
|
FINISHED |
| Object | foreign affairs |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: foreign affairs | Statement: [UK government, retainedPowers, foreign affairs]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: retainedPowers Context triple: [UK government, retainedPowers, foreign affairs]
-
A.
majorPowerIn
Indicates that an entity holds significant political, economic, or military influence within a specified domain, region, or context.
-
B.
hasPower
chosen
Indicates that one entity possesses authority, control, or influence over another entity or over a particular domain or resource.
-
C.
ratifiedBy
Indicates that an agreement, treaty, or decision has been formally approved and made officially valid by a specified authority or body.
-
D.
hasPolity
Indicates that one entity possesses, controls, or is associated with a particular political organization, governance structure, or state-like authority.
-
E.
reserves
Indicates that an entity has arranged in advance to hold or secure something for future use or access.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a2480baefc81909951b14058479aa2 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:42 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a24b1bf2c081908f20e13939b713ff |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:55 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a24abd07508190a83ffba5368c1c79 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:54 a.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:47 a.m.