Triple

T4671842
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject clear and present danger test E103580 entity
Predicate appliedInCase P13176 FINISHED
Object Whitney v. California E179507 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Whitney v. California | Statement: [clear and present danger test, appliedInCase, Whitney v. California]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Whitney v. California
Context triple: [clear and present danger test, appliedInCase, Whitney v. California]
  • A. Whitney v. California chosen
    Whitney v. California was a 1927 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld a conviction under a state criminal syndicalism law and became historically significant for Justice Brandeis’s influential concurrence on free speech before later being overruled.
  • B. Bridges v. California
    Bridges v. California is a 1941 U.S. Supreme Court decision that significantly expanded First Amendment protections by limiting the power of courts to punish out-of-court publications as contempt.
  • C. Miller v. California
    Miller v. California is a landmark 1973 U.S. Supreme Court decision that redefined the legal test for obscenity and allowed greater regulation of pornographic materials.
  • D. Rochin v. California
    Rochin v. California is a 1952 U.S. Supreme Court case that held evidence obtained by methods that "shock the conscience," such as forcibly pumping a suspect’s stomach, violates the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
  • E. Cantwell v. Connecticut
    Cantwell v. Connecticut is a 1940 U.S. Supreme Court case that first applied the First Amendment’s Free Exercise Clause to the states, striking down a state law that improperly restricted religious proselytizing.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69bd43dda32c8190938b37744ca270fc completed March 20, 2026, 12:55 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69bd63506090819083ff8271adc5ef75 completed March 20, 2026, 3:10 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69be039538048190b4075daf47355cee completed March 21, 2026, 2:33 a.m.
Created at: March 20, 2026, 1:15 p.m.