Triple
T4645967
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | National Minimum Drinking Age Act of 1984 |
E101771
|
entity |
| Predicate | challengedInCase |
P3996
|
FINISHED |
| Object | South Dakota v. Dole |
E18538
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: South Dakota v. Dole | Statement: [National Minimum Drinking Age Act of 1984, challengedInCase, South Dakota v. Dole]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: South Dakota v. Dole Context triple: [National Minimum Drinking Age Act of 1984, challengedInCase, South Dakota v. Dole]
-
A.
South Dakota v. Dole
chosen
South Dakota v. Dole is a 1987 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld Congress’s power to condition federal highway funds on states adopting a minimum drinking age of 21, helping define the scope of the federal spending power.
-
B.
Alden v. Maine
Alden v. Maine is a 1999 U.S. Supreme Court decision that expanded state sovereign immunity by holding that states are generally immune from private suits for damages in their own courts under federal law.
-
C.
City of Boerne v. Flores
City of Boerne v. Flores is a 1997 U.S. Supreme Court case that curtailed Congress’s power under the Fourteenth Amendment and held that the Religious Freedom Restoration Act could not be applied to the states.
-
D.
Timbs v. Indiana
Timbs v. Indiana is a 2019 U.S. Supreme Court case that held the Eighth Amendment’s Excessive Fines Clause applies to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment.
-
E.
Plyler v. Doe
Plyler v. Doe is a 1982 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held states cannot deny free public education to children based on their immigration status, recognizing such exclusion as a violation of the Equal Protection Clause.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69bd43d3bc7c81908f81fcf380476b0f |
completed | March 20, 2026, 12:55 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69bd623815288190b21cf59a3786363d |
completed | March 20, 2026, 3:05 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69bdfadc5dc081908d56a49895105efb |
completed | March 21, 2026, 1:56 a.m. |
Created at: March 20, 2026, 1:14 p.m.