Triple
T4642495
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Marigold |
E101685
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasEtymologicalSource |
P5801
|
FINISHED |
| Object | English word "marigold" |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: English word "marigold" | Statement: [Marigold, hasEtymologicalSource, English word "marigold"]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasEtymologicalSource Context triple: [Marigold, hasEtymologicalSource, English word "marigold"]
-
A.
etymologicalSource
chosen
Indicates that one term or name originates from, is derived from, or has its roots in another term or name.
-
B.
etymologyStatus
Indicates the status or reliability classification of an etymological explanation for a term or name.
-
C.
etymologicalField
Indicates that one term belongs to a particular semantic or conceptual domain relevant to its etymological origin or historical development.
-
D.
etymologicalLanguage
Indicates the language from which a word or term is historically derived in its etymology.
-
E.
etymologyType
Indicates the specific kind or category of etymological relationship that links a term to its linguistic origin or source.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69bd43d3bc7c81908f81fcf380476b0f |
completed | March 20, 2026, 12:55 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69bd5a93047c8190990c94fd5a57c867 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 2:32 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69bd5234d24c819095c79890b70eff9a |
completed | March 20, 2026, 1:57 p.m. |
Created at: March 20, 2026, 1:14 p.m.