Triple

T461534
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Boston Landmark (some components) E7348 entity
Predicate hasHeritageType P5929 FINISHED
Object cultural landscape LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: cultural landscape | Statement: [Boston Landmark (some components), hasHeritageType, cultural landscape]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasHeritageType
Context triple: [Boston Landmark (some components), hasHeritageType, cultural landscape]
  • A. hasHeritage
    Indicates that an entity possesses or is associated with a particular cultural, ethnic, or ancestral background.
  • B. heritageType chosen
    Indicates the classification of an entity’s cultural or natural heritage category or type within a heritage framework.
  • C. hasHeritageOrganization
    Indicates that an entity is associated with, or belongs to, a particular heritage-related organization.
  • D. heritageField
    Indicates that there is an association between an entity and a specific field, domain, or area related to cultural or historical heritage.
  • E. heritageStatus
    Indicates that an entity holds a particular cultural, historical, or natural heritage designation or protection status.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a2e7e5c5bc8190a1dc8178218fba40 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:04 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a2efbed5b88190a45716812eb4cfdf completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:38 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a2ede75b6c81908350103d21f22a03 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:30 p.m.
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:12 p.m.