Triple

T461280
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Gideon v. Wainwright E7343 entity
Predicate fullName P16 FINISHED
Object Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 (1963) E7343 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 (1963) | Statement: [Gideon v. Wainwright, fullName, Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 (1963)]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 (1963)
Context triple: [Gideon v. Wainwright, fullName, Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 (1963)]
  • A. Gideon v. Wainwright chosen
    Gideon v. Wainwright is a landmark 1963 U.S. Supreme Court decision that guaranteed the right to court-appointed counsel for criminal defendants who cannot afford an attorney.
  • B. Mapp v. Ohio
    Mapp v. Ohio is a landmark 1961 U.S. Supreme Court case that applied the exclusionary rule to the states, holding that evidence obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment cannot be used in state criminal prosecutions.
  • C. Printz v. United States
    Printz v. United States is a 1997 U.S. Supreme Court decision that limited federal power by holding that Congress cannot compel state or local officials to implement federal regulatory programs.
  • D. Escobedo v. Illinois
    Escobedo v. Illinois is a landmark 1964 U.S. Supreme Court case that expanded the Sixth Amendment right to counsel during police interrogations and helped lay the groundwork for the later Miranda warnings.
  • E. Furman v. Georgia
    Furman v. Georgia is a landmark 1972 U.S. Supreme Court case that temporarily halted capital punishment nationwide by ruling existing death penalty schemes unconstitutional under the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a2e7e5c5bc8190a1dc8178218fba40 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:04 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a2efbed5b88190a45716812eb4cfdf completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:38 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69a44f59e9348190a53c1734b95bc2c3 completed March 1, 2026, 2:38 p.m.
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:12 p.m.