Triple

T4596830
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Jackson Purchase E100224 entity
Predicate contains P35 FINISHED
Object Marshall County E185071 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Marshall County | Statement: [Jackson Purchase, contains, Marshall County]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Marshall County
Context triple: [Jackson Purchase, contains, Marshall County]
  • A. Marshall County chosen
    Marshall County is a county in northern Alabama known for its scenic location around Lake Guntersville and its mix of small towns and rural communities.
  • B. Morgan County
    Morgan County is a county in northern Alabama known for its seat in Decatur and its role in the Huntsville-Decatur metropolitan area.
  • C. Morgan County
    Morgan County is a rural county in northern Utah known for its mountainous terrain, outdoor recreation, and small-town communities northeast of Salt Lake City.
  • D. Morgan County
    Morgan County is a rural county in northeastern Colorado known for its agricultural economy and small communities centered around the city of Fort Morgan.
  • E. Macon County
    Macon County is a rural county in central Georgia known for its agricultural landscape and small-town communities.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69bd43cbc014819098b45f435908f88a completed March 20, 2026, 12:55 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69bd594055dc8190a50f1b4be2be1ba0 completed March 20, 2026, 2:27 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69becf8f926481908f6e1cf33fc79a04 completed March 21, 2026, 5:04 p.m.
Created at: March 20, 2026, 1:11 p.m.