Triple
T4594672
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Buck v. Bell opinion |
E103577
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasSubsequentTreatment |
P58195
|
FINISHED |
| Object | effectively discredited by later substantive due process jurisprudence |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: effectively discredited by later substantive due process jurisprudence | Statement: [Buck v. Bell opinion, hasSubsequentTreatment, effectively discredited by later substantive due process jurisprudence]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasSubsequentTreatment Context triple: [Buck v. Bell opinion, hasSubsequentTreatment, effectively discredited by later substantive due process jurisprudence]
-
A.
hasSubsequent
Indicates that one entity occurs, appears, or is positioned after another in a defined sequence or order.
-
B.
hasCommonTreatment
Indicates that two or more entities share at least one treatment method or therapeutic approach in common.
-
C.
hasSubsequentAward
Indicates that an entity has received an additional award that follows a previous award in time or sequence.
-
D.
hasSubsequentStandard
Indicates that one standard is followed or superseded by another standard that comes after it in sequence or version.
-
E.
subsequentUse
Indicates that one entity is used, applied, or consumed after another entity in time or sequence.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69bd43dccaf08190aa89e9991a289719 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 12:55 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69bd593e115081909b11149e02fe4ef3 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 2:27 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69bd522c811c81909aae4feadae33174 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 1:57 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69bd56b4a9508190acdb888eef18f1ee |
completed | March 20, 2026, 2:16 p.m. |
Created at: March 20, 2026, 1:11 p.m.