Triple

T4594670
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Buck v. Bell opinion E103577 entity
Predicate citedBy P771 FINISHED
Object Skinner v. Oklahoma E362099 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Skinner v. Oklahoma | Statement: [Buck v. Bell opinion, citedBy, Skinner v. Oklahoma]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Skinner v. Oklahoma
Context triple: [Buck v. Bell opinion, citedBy, Skinner v. Oklahoma]
  • A. Skinner v. Oklahoma chosen
    Skinner v. Oklahoma is a landmark 1942 U.S. Supreme Court decision that struck down a state law mandating the sterilization of certain criminal offenders, recognizing procreation as a fundamental right under the Equal Protection Clause.
  • B. Strickland v. Washington
    Strickland v. Washington is a landmark 1984 U.S. Supreme Court case that established the two-pronged test for determining when a criminal defendant’s right to effective assistance of counsel has been violated.
  • C. Powell v. Alabama
    Powell v. Alabama is a landmark 1932 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held in capital cases the Due Process Clause requires defendants be given access to effective legal counsel, especially when they are young, illiterate, or otherwise disadvantaged.
  • D. Rochin v. California
    Rochin v. California is a 1952 U.S. Supreme Court case that held evidence obtained by methods that "shock the conscience," such as forcibly pumping a suspect’s stomach, violates the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
  • E. Craig v. Boren
    Craig v. Boren is a 1976 U.S. Supreme Court case that established intermediate scrutiny as the standard for evaluating gender-based classifications under the Equal Protection Clause.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69bd43dccaf08190aa89e9991a289719 completed March 20, 2026, 12:55 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69bd593e115081909b11149e02fe4ef3 completed March 20, 2026, 2:27 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69bdfa4552148190be200be028ef3fdd completed March 21, 2026, 1:54 a.m.
Created at: March 20, 2026, 1:11 p.m.