Triple
T459377
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | The HP Way: How Bill Hewlett and I Built Our Company |
E7302
|
entity |
| Predicate | illustratesValue |
P463
|
FINISHED |
| Object | integrity in business |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: integrity in business | Statement: [The HP Way: How Bill Hewlett and I Built Our Company, illustratesValue, integrity in business]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: illustratesValue Context triple: [The HP Way: How Bill Hewlett and I Built Our Company, illustratesValue, integrity in business]
-
A.
value
Indicates that one entity possesses, represents, or corresponds to a particular quantity, quality, or assigned worth.
-
B.
demonstratedBy
Indicates that something is shown, proven, or made evident through the actions, behavior, or example of a particular entity.
-
C.
hasIllustrations
Indicates that an entity includes or is accompanied by visual illustrations.
-
D.
hasIllustrationsBy
Indicates that one entity (such as a work or publication) includes illustrations that were created by another entity (the illustrator).
-
E.
demonstratedConcept
chosen
Indicates that an entity has shown, illustrated, or made evident a particular concept through example, explanation, or action.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a2e7e5c5bc8190a1dc8178218fba40 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:04 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a2efa4a6208190a8243a0e14f84f52 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:37 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a2ede75b6c81908350103d21f22a03 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:30 p.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:12 p.m.