Triple

T4583743
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Fermina Daza E101915 entity
Predicate associatedWithAuthorStyle P27486 FINISHED
Object magical realism context LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: magical realism context | Statement: [Fermina Daza, associatedWithAuthorStyle, magical realism context]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: associatedWithAuthorStyle
Context triple: [Fermina Daza, associatedWithAuthorStyle, magical realism context]
  • A. authorStyle chosen
    Indicates the stylistic characteristics or manner of expression associated with a particular author in their works.
  • B. placeAssociatedWithAuthor
    Indicates a relationship where a place is connected to an author, such as by birth, residence, work, or significant activity.
  • C. associatedWithAuthorCycle
    Indicates a relationship where an entity is linked to a recurring or cyclical pattern involving an author, such as repeated collaborations, works, or roles over time.
  • D. relatedStyle
    Indicates that one style is associated with, similar to, or derived from another style in some relevant way.
  • E. usedWithStyle
    Indicates that something is employed or applied in conjunction with a particular style or stylistic manner.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69bd43d4ce208190b53158c882b222e3 completed March 20, 2026, 12:55 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69bd590411dc81909c55d1c42a4d44ef completed March 20, 2026, 2:26 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69bd522acbcc8190bf24d9517793a2c1 completed March 20, 2026, 1:56 p.m.
Created at: March 20, 2026, 1:10 p.m.