Triple
T4576363
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Republic of China (Taiwan) |
E123148
|
entity |
| Predicate | claimsStatus |
P32091
|
FINISHED |
| Object | continuation of the Republic of China founded in 1912 |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: continuation of the Republic of China founded in 1912 | Statement: [Republic of China (Taiwan), claimsStatus, continuation of the Republic of China founded in 1912]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: claimsStatus Context triple: [Republic of China (Taiwan), claimsStatus, continuation of the Republic of China founded in 1912]
-
A.
statusIndicates
Indicates that a particular status value conveys or reflects the current condition, state, or situation of an entity or process.
-
B.
appealStatus
Indicates the current state or outcome of an appeal within a review or decision process.
-
C.
guaranteeStatus
Indicates the current state or condition of a guarantee associated with an entity or agreement.
-
D.
complainantStatus
Indicates the role or standing of the person or party making a complaint in relation to the case or issue.
-
E.
claimsToBe
chosen
Indicates that one entity asserts or declares itself to have a particular identity, role, or property, regardless of whether this assertion is true.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69bd46466c7081909d07f36be2d08804 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 1:06 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69bd58dfe3508190b21836079e951a3c |
completed | March 20, 2026, 2:25 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69bd5228b70c8190ac48705e35a710c1 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 1:56 p.m. |
Created at: March 20, 2026, 1:10 p.m.