Triple
T45715
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Chilean peso |
E895
|
entity |
| Predicate | usedInAccounting |
P591
|
FINISHED |
| Object | business accounting in Chile |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: business accounting in Chile | Statement: [Chilean peso, usedInAccounting, business accounting in Chile]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: usedInAccounting Context triple: [Chilean peso, usedInAccounting, business accounting in Chile]
-
A.
usedFor
Indicates that one entity serves a purpose, function, or role in accomplishing, enabling, or supporting another entity or activity.
-
B.
usedAt
chosen
Indicates that something is employed, applied, or utilized at a particular place, time, or context.
-
C.
usedInLanguage
Indicates that something (such as a word, expression, or symbol) is employed or occurs within a particular language.
-
D.
usedOn
Indicates that one entity is applied to, operated on, or otherwise utilized in relation to another entity.
-
E.
actualUse
Indicates that an entity is currently being used or utilized in practice, as opposed to being merely available, planned, or potential.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a2480baefc81909951b14058479aa2 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:42 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a24ba7016481909d595402712db6e2 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:57 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a24abbd32c81908cec461d9097662e |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:54 a.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:47 a.m.