Triple

T456671
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Georgian script E7247 entity
Predicate writingMediumHistorical P13697 FINISHED
Object stone inscriptions LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: stone inscriptions | Statement: [Georgian script, writingMediumHistorical, stone inscriptions]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: writingMediumHistorical
Context triple: [Georgian script, writingMediumHistorical, stone inscriptions]
  • A. historicalScript
    Indicates that an entity is or was written in, or otherwise associated with, a particular historical writing system or script.
  • B. historicalForm
    Indicates that one entity is an earlier or historically attested form or variant of another entity.
  • C. historicalReference
    Indicates that one entity refers to, cites, or alludes to another entity from an earlier time or historical context.
  • D. historicalCategory
    Indicates that an entity is classified within a particular historical grouping, period, or type based on its time-related characteristics or context.
  • E. historicallyIn
    Indicates that one entity existed, occurred, or was situated within the historical context, period, or jurisdiction associated with another entity.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a2e7e5c5bc8190a1dc8178218fba40 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:04 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a2efa1616481909399f92551a0c9e3 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:37 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a2ede614b88190be07425f5535f56d completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:30 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69a2ee8b56d08190bd625626353d01b4 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:32 p.m.
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:12 p.m.