Triple
T4563273
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | 3rd Dynasty of Egypt |
E121847
|
entity |
| Predicate | architecturalInnovation |
P5770
|
FINISHED |
| Object | step pyramid design |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: step pyramid design | Statement: [3rd Dynasty of Egypt, architecturalInnovation, step pyramid design]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: architecturalInnovation Context triple: [3rd Dynasty of Egypt, architecturalInnovation, step pyramid design]
-
A.
architecturalContribution
Indicates a relationship where an entity contributes to the design, planning, or creation of an architectural work or feature.
-
B.
architecturalConcept
chosen
Indicates that one entity represents or embodies an architectural concept in relation to another entity.
-
C.
architecturalInfluence
Indicates that one architectural style, structure, or designer has had a formative impact on the design, style, or features of another.
-
D.
architecturalWork
Indicates that one entity is an architectural creation (such as a building or structure) designed or realized by another entity.
-
E.
architecturalUse
Indicates how a structure, space, or element is intended to be used or function within an architectural context.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69bd463f156881908a99aca69c5721ac |
completed | March 20, 2026, 1:06 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69bd5830b4308190a63699bf28922375 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 2:22 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69bd52254c648190a5144cfe8fa7e409 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 1:56 p.m. |
Created at: March 20, 2026, 1:09 p.m.