Triple
T4560237
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Legal Tender Act of 1862 |
E120573
|
entity |
| Predicate | constitutionalControversy |
P12338
|
FINISHED |
| Object | raised questions about Congress’s power to make paper money legal tender |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: raised questions about Congress’s power to make paper money legal tender | Statement: [Legal Tender Act of 1862, constitutionalControversy, raised questions about Congress’s power to make paper money legal tender]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: constitutionalControversy Context triple: [Legal Tender Act of 1862, constitutionalControversy, raised questions about Congress’s power to make paper money legal tender]
-
A.
constitutionalDebate
chosen
Indicates a relationship where parties are engaged in discussing, disputing, or interpreting the meaning, scope, or application of a constitution.
-
B.
constitutionalChallenge
Indicates a legal action or argument asserting that a law, policy, or governmental act violates a constitution and should be reviewed or invalidated.
-
C.
constitutionalNumber
Indicates that an entity has a specific number or count defined or constrained by a constitution or foundational governing document.
-
D.
constitutionalImpact
Indicates the effect or influence that an action, event, or condition has on a constitution or constitutional framework.
-
E.
constitutionalMention
Indicates that something is explicitly referenced or discussed within a constitution or constitutional document.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69bd4636f1648190a701445c2fcd9c17 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 1:05 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69bd582b871c8190be0b70c76d639000 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 2:22 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69bd52254c648190a5144cfe8fa7e409 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 1:56 p.m. |
Created at: March 20, 2026, 1:09 p.m.