Triple
T4555243
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Joomla! |
E120463
|
entity |
| Predicate | supportsMediaManagement |
P57995
|
FINISHED |
| Object | yes |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: yes | Statement: [Joomla!, supportsMediaManagement, yes]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: supportsMediaManagement Context triple: [Joomla!, supportsMediaManagement, yes]
-
A.
supportsDeviceManagement
Indicates that one entity provides capabilities or functionality to manage, configure, or control another entity’s devices.
-
B.
hasMediaHub
Indicates that one entity possesses, contains, or is associated with a central platform or facility for managing, distributing, or accessing media content.
-
C.
hasCommonMedia
Indicates that two entities share at least one media item (such as an image, video, or audio file) in common.
-
D.
supportsInstallationMedia
Indicates that one entity is capable of accepting, handling, or working with a specified type of installation media for setup or deployment purposes.
-
E.
hasMediaFacilities
Indicates that an entity possesses or provides access to media-related infrastructure or equipment (such as studios, recording, broadcasting, or production facilities).
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69bd4636f1648190a701445c2fcd9c17 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 1:05 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69bd5813af948190b10b02dadf6496bf |
completed | March 20, 2026, 2:22 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69bd5223423c81908317351b58cff5f5 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 1:56 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69bd56b4a9508190acdb888eef18f1ee |
completed | March 20, 2026, 2:16 p.m. |
Created at: March 20, 2026, 1:09 p.m.